Shelton-King v. Dc Crime Victims Fund
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
FILED
DANIELLE SHELTON-KING,
§ JuL 1 0 2013 Plaintiff, ) Clerk, U.S. District and ) Bankruptcy Courts v ) Civil Action N0. ) .. _ . D.C. CRIME vic'rlms FUND, er al., ) l g ' LC’ ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on consideration of the plaintiff s application to proceed in forma pauperis and her pro se complaint. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants breached a confidentiality agreement and thereby put her safety at risk. She demands damages of $10,000 and a temporary restraining order.
Federal district courts have jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See 28 U.S.C. § 1331. In addition, federal district courts have jurisdiction over civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000, and the suit is between citizens of different states. See 28 U.S.C. § l332(a). This complaint neither states a federal claim, nor establishes that the amount of controversy meets the $75,00() threshold, nor demonstrates that the parties are citizens of different states. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss
this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction An Order consistent with this Memorandum
M/»F~
United StJtes District Judge
Opinion is issued separately.
DATE; (p/)~(P/?»@ (`?°
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shelton-King v. Dc Crime Victims Fund (Shelton-King v. Dc Crime Victims Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.