Shelley v. Baker

54 S.E. 653, 125 Ga. 663, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 241
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 24, 1906·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. A promissory note not containing any words of negotiability is so far negotiable by indorsement of the payee in blank as to pass the-title to a bona fide holder and enable him to sue the maker in his own name; and while the maker of such note could, as against the holder, set up all the defenses which would have been open to him against the-payee, nevertheless, if, when sued by the holder upon the note, the maker fails to set up and sustain by evidence any defense which would have been good as against the payee, the holder is entitled to a recovery against the maker. See National Bank v. Leonard, 91 Ga. 805.

2. There was no error in overruling the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shelley v. Baker, 54 S.E. 653, 125 Ga. 663, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 241 (Ga. 1906).

54 S.E. 653 (Shelley v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peck v. Calhoun
145 S.E. 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Foley v. Hardy
253 P. 238 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1927)
Fourth National Bank v. Odom
93 S.E. 91 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Andrews v. John Church Co.
58 S.E. 130 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)