Fourth National Bank v. Odom
This text of 93 S.E. 91 (Fourth National Bank v. Odom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The court did not err in overruling the demurrer to the petition for interpleader. “Whenever a person is possessed of property •or funds, or owes a debt or duty, to which more than one person lays claim, and the claims are of such a character as to render it doubtful or. dangerous for the holder to act, he may apply to equity to compel the claimants to interplead.” Civil Code (1910), § 5471.
2. Where one holds a non-negotiable note containing language which would place a prudent man upon his guard, the maker of such note could, as against the holder, make all the defenses which would have been open to-him against the payee. Civil Code (1910), § 3653; Guerry v. Perryman, 6 Ga. 119; Shelley v. Baker, 125 Ga. 663 (54 S. E. 653) ; 7 Cyc. 606, 607, 608.
3. The cases of Ball v. Madden, 139 Ga. 727 (78 S. E. 26), and Ball v. Citizens Bank, 143 Ga. 55 (84 S. E. 122), were correctly decided, and [171]*171the request to review and overrule them is denied. Those cases originated in a petition for injunction filed by Madden, a lessee of land under a written contract, signed in duplicate, alleging that the original landlord had assigned his interest in the lease contract, and that the transferee of the contract and also a purchaser of the land “were both about to distrain for the rent of that year.” These cases stand upon a totally different basis from one where a “negotiable note” is purchased before maturity and without notice of defenses, and where the holder is suing, not for rent, but upon the obligation of the maker to such transferee. Likewise the instant case does not involve the question of preserving the rights of bona fide holders of “negotiable” instruments.-
[171]*171 Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 S.E. 91, 147 Ga. 170, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fourth-national-bank-v-odom-ga-1917.