Shell v. Huddleston

2 Tenn. 39
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedApril 6, 1809
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 Tenn. 39 (Shell v. Huddleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shell v. Huddleston, 2 Tenn. 39 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1809).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If the jury should be of opinion, that the defendant levied on the same execution a second time, after it had been satisfied by the first levy ; and that the plaintiff assigned the note to relieve his property from execution, they ought to give a verdict for the plaintiff. But otherwise, if the plaintiff voluntarily assigned the note, without any restraint whatever. The execution should have been, returned within twenty days after it issued, but not returning it in time, would not vitiate the proceedings under it. It was not made to appear when the constable levied on, and sold the property. The law will presume it was correctly done, that is, before the expiration of the twenty days allowed by law for the return of the execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Williamson
99 S.W.2d 76 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1936)
Anderson v. Bowling
1 Thompson 60 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Tenn. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shell-v-huddleston-tennsuperct-1809.