Anderson v. Bowling

Tennessee Supreme Court

Anderson v. Bowling

1 Shan. Cas. 38

DecidedSeptember 15, 1850

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Shan. Cas. 38 (Anderson v. Bowling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anderson v. Bowling, 1 Shan. Cas. 38 (Tenn. 1850).

Pincite

Opinion

An officer justified on trial of an action of trover under an execution issued by a justice of tbe peace more than thirty days before the levy. The court below charged that it would not protect him.

Heiskeli for' the plaintiff below, cited Clingman v. Barrett, 6 Hum., 21, and Rogers v. Hunter, MS., Knoxville, 1849. [In a footnote to this case as reported in Thomp. Cas., p. 60, it is said that this so^-called MS. opinion was oral dicta by McKinney, Judge.]

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

An officer justified on trial of an action of trover under an execution issued by a justice of tbe peace more than thirty days before the levy. The court below charged that it would not protect him.

Heiskeli for' the plaintiff below, cited Clingman v. Barrett, 6 Hum., 21, and Rogers v. Hunter, MS., Knoxville, 1849. [In a footnote to this case as reported in Thomp. Cas., p. 60, it is said that this so^-called MS. opinion was oral dicta by McKinney, Judge.]

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Shan. Cas. 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anderson-v-bowling-tenn-1850.