Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Bell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Bell

137 S.E.2d 398, 109 Ga. App. 768, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 988

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 28, 1964

Docket40673

StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E.2d 398 (Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shelby Mutual Insurance v. Bell, 137 S.E.2d 398, 109 Ga. App. 768, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 988 (Ga. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Jordan, Judge.

A hearing was held before a deputy director of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation to determine liability, disability, compensation, and medical, arising out of an injury allegedly sustained by the claimant-employee on April 17, 1961. The parties stipulated that the burden of proof was on the claimant. The deputy director found that the claimant was suffering from a partial incapacity to work, but that this disability primarily resulted from a back injury sustained in April, 1957, and was not traceable to the injury of April 1961, upon which the claim was predicated. Accordingly, an award denying compensation was entered by the deputy director, and was affirmed by the full board. The Superior Court of Thomas County reversed the award of the full board and remanded the case to the board with direction that an award for permanent partial disability be issued in favor of the claimant. The exception is to that judgment. Held:

The finding of the deputy director which was affirmed by the full board that the claimant’s disability was not traceable to the 1961 injury upon which the claim was predicated but resulted from a back injury sustained in 1957 was fully authorized by the evidence including the testimony of the claimant’s medical witness; and in the absence of a showing that the award was based on fraud or a mistake of law, it was error for the superior court to reverse the award of the board. Hall v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co., 96 Ga. App. 567 (101 SE2d 94); Indemnity Ins. Co. v. O’Neal, 104 Ga. App. 305 (3) (121 SE2d 689). The evidence in this case did not demand a finding that the injury of April 1961 aggravated the claimant’s pre-existing condition and further diminished his earning capacity; and the case of Aetna Cas. &c. Co. v. Cagle, 106 Ga. [769]*769App. 440 (126 SE2d 907), relied upon by the claimant’s counsel, is not controlling here.

Decided May 28, 1964. Conger & Conger, Leonard H. Conger, for plaintiffs in error. Forester & Calhoun, Marcus B. Calhoun, Alexander, Vann & Lilly, contra.

Judgment reversed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jordan, Judge.

A hearing was held before a deputy director of the State Board of Workmen’s Compensation to determine liability, disability, compensation, and medical, arising out of an injury allegedly sustained by the claimant-employee on April 17, 1961. The parties stipulated that the burden of proof was on the claimant. The deputy director found that the claimant was suffering from a partial incapacity to work, but that this disability primarily resulted from a back injury sustained in April, 1957, and was not traceable to the injury of April 1961, upon which the claim was predicated. Accordingly, an award denying compensation was entered by the deputy director, and was affirmed by the full board. The Superior Court of Thomas County reversed the award of the full board and remanded the case to the board with direction that an award for permanent partial disability be issued in favor of the claimant. The exception is to that judgment. Held:

The finding of the deputy director which was affirmed by the full board that the claimant’s disability was not traceable to the 1961 injury upon which the claim was predicated but resulted from a back injury sustained in 1957 was fully authorized by the evidence including the testimony of the claimant’s medical witness; and in the absence of a showing that the award was based on fraud or a mistake of law, it was error for the superior court to reverse the award of the board. Hall v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co., 96 Ga. App. 567 (101 SE2d 94); Indemnity Ins. Co. v. O’Neal, 104 Ga. App. 305 (3) (121 SE2d 689). The evidence in this case did not demand a finding that the injury of April 1961 aggravated the claimant’s pre-existing condition and further diminished his earning capacity; and the case of Aetna Cas. &c. Co. v. Cagle, 106 Ga. [769]*769App. 440 (126 SE2d 907), relied upon by the claimant’s counsel, is not controlling here.

Decided May 28, 1964. Conger & Conger, Leonard H. Conger, for plaintiffs in error. Forester & Calhoun, Marcus B. Calhoun, Alexander, Vann & Lilly, contra.

Judgment reversed.

Bell, P. J., and Eberhardt, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 S.E.2d 398, 109 Ga. App. 768, 1964 Ga. App. LEXIS 988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shelby-mutual-insurance-v-bell-gactapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack