Sheikh v. 7-Eleven

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 13, 2005·No. 05-1075·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1075

CHIM S. SHEIKH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

7-ELEVEN,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-2270-AW)

Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: September 13, 2005

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anne J. A. Gbenjo, THE GBENJO LAW GROUP, Houston, Texas; Jo Ann P. Myles, LAW OFFICE OF JO ANN P. MYLES, Largo, Maryland, for Appellant. Eric A. Welter, WELTER LAW FIRM, P.C., Herndon, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Chim S. Sheikh appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for 7-Eleven, Inc. and dismissing his

claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See Sheikh v. 7-Eleven, No. CA-

03-2270-AW (D. Md. Dec. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sheikh v. 7-Eleven, (4th Cir. 2005).

Sheikh v. 7-Eleven (Sheikh v. 7-Eleven) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.