Sheikh v. 7-Eleven
This text of Sheikh v. 7-Eleven (Sheikh v. 7-Eleven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1075
CHIM S. SHEIKH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
7-ELEVEN,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-03-2270-AW)
Submitted: July 29, 2005 Decided: September 13, 2005
Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anne J. A. Gbenjo, THE GBENJO LAW GROUP, Houston, Texas; Jo Ann P. Myles, LAW OFFICE OF JO ANN P. MYLES, Largo, Maryland, for Appellant. Eric A. Welter, WELTER LAW FIRM, P.C., Herndon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Chim S. Sheikh appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for 7-Eleven, Inc. and dismissing his
claims of employment discrimination. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Sheikh v. 7-Eleven, No. CA-
03-2270-AW (D. Md. Dec. 17, 2004). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sheikh v. 7-Eleven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sheikh-v-7-eleven-ca4-2005.