Shaw v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shaw v. State

528 So. 2d 118, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1634, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3034, 1988 WL 72171

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1795 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 13, 1988·No. No. 87-1300·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order summarily denying appellant’s 3.850 motion for post conviction relief on grounds that it is legally insufficient is affirmed without prejudice. Appellant may file an amended motion before the trial court for review setting forth any sufficient reasons why he did not include his arguments in the previous motion. See Tanner v. State, 502 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The order summarily denying appellant’s 3.850 motion for post conviction relief on grounds that it is legally insufficient is affirmed without prejudice. Appellant may file an amended motion before the trial court for review setting forth any sufficient reasons why he did not include his arguments in the previous motion. See Tanner v. State, 502 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987).

AFFIRMED.

SMITH, C.J., and JOANOS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Shaw v. State, 528 So. 2d 118, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1634, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3034, 1988 WL 72171 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

528 So. 2d 118 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related