Shaw v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shaw v. State

484 So. 2d 648, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 640, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 12, 1986

DocketNo. 84-1412

StatusPublished

This text of 484 So. 2d 648 (Shaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. State, 484 So. 2d 648, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 640, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is remanded for resentencing.

First of all no written reasons were given for departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla.1985).

Second, there were apparently two scoresheets involved. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)l clearly mandates that “One guideline scoresheet ... be prepared ... covering all offenses pending before the court for sentencing.” It is true there is no showing of how the presence of two scoresheets prejudiced the defendant. Nonetheless, since this cause must be remanded in any event, a single scoresheet should be employed.

In all other respects this cause is affirmed.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI