Shaw v. State

484 So. 2d 648, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 640, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1795
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 12, 1986·No. No. 84-1412·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is remanded for resentencing.

First of all no written reasons were given for departure from the sentencing guidelines. See State v. Boynton, 478 So.2d 351 (Fla.1985).

Second, there were apparently two scoresheets involved. Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701(d)l clearly mandates that “One guideline scoresheet ... be prepared ... covering all offenses pending before the court for sentencing.” It is true there is no showing of how the presence of two scoresheets prejudiced the defendant. Nonetheless, since this cause must be remanded in any event, a single scoresheet should be employed.

In all other respects this cause is affirmed.

LETTS, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. State, 484 So. 2d 648, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 640, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 6864 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

484 So. 2d 648 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Boynton
478 So. 2d 351 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)