Shaw v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shaw v. State

443 So. 2d 342, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25354

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaw v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 449 So. 2d 976 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 1983·No. No. 83-630·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Shaw appeals a judgment and sentence rendered following an order denying his motion to discharge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.

Shaw’s attorney filed an Anders brief.¹ Upon notification of this fact, Shaw filed a pro se brief. After an independent examination of the record and the law, we find no merit to this appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Nathaniel Shaw appeals a judgment and sentence rendered following an order denying his motion to discharge under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191.

Shaw’s attorney filed an Anders brief.¹ Upon notification of this fact, Shaw filed a pro se brief. After an independent examination of the record and the law, we find no merit to this appeal.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and RYDER and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Shaw v. State, 443 So. 2d 342, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25354 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

443 So. 2d 342 (Shaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related