Shaw v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided January 22, 2025·No. 2:16-cv-00729·Unknown

Opinion

1 RIVERA HEWITT PAUL LLP JONATHAN B. PAUL, SBN 215884 2 WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589 2355 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 170 3 Gold River, CA 95670 Telephone: 916-922-1200 Facsimile: 916-922-1303 4 Email: JPaul@rhplawyers.com wmotooka@rhplawyers.com 5 Attorneys for Defendants COLIN MASON, 6 STEVEN FORSYTH, KENNETH SHELTON, and REID HARRIS 7 8 Jeff Dominic Price JDP PC | SBN 165534 23465 Civic Center Wy., Bldg 9 9 Malibu, California 90265 jdp@jdpfirm.com 10 Tel. 310.451.2222 11 Cate Beekman SBN 245605 Beekman & Chikhani, LLP 12 711 Jefferson Street, Suite 101 Fairfield, California 94533 13 Tel. 510.326.5963 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff SHEENA SHAW 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 SHEENA SHAW, Case No.: 2:16-cv-00729 TLN CKD 20 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR 21 vs. CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 22 DEPUTY COLIN MASON #461, DEPUTY STEVEN FORSYTH #874, 23 DEPUTY KENNETH SHELTON #1021, DEPUTY REID HARRIS #238, and DOES 24 1-10, inclusive, 25 Defendants. 26

27 28 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 1 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 2 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 3 Such confidential information includes criminal records, some of which may be subject to a state 4 court sealing order; personnel records; medical and psychiatric records; and other sensitive 5 information or documents. 6 Therefore, Plaintiff SHEENA SHAW and Defendants COLIN MASON, STEVEN 7 FORSYTH, KENNETH SHELTON, and REID HARRIS, by and through their respective 8 counsel, hereby stipulate that the terms of this protective order, if approved by the Court, shall 9 apply to the materials designated as confidential in this action. 10 STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER 11 A. DEFINITIONS 12 The following definitions shall apply to this Protective Order: 13 1. The “Action” shall mean and refer to the above-captioned matter and any appeal 14 from the Action, through final judgment. 15 2. “Documents” or “Confidential Documents” shall mean the Documents that 16 plaintiff or defendants designate as “Confidential” in the manner set forth in this Protective Order. 17 3. “Confidential” shall mean information designated “Confidential” pursuant to this 18 Protective Order. Information designated “Confidential” shall be information that is determined 19 in good faith by the attorneys representing the Designating Party to be subject to protection 20 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c). Confidential Documents, material, and/or information shall be 21 used solely for purposes of litigation. Confidential Information shall not be used by the non- 22 Designating Party for any business or other purpose, unless agreed to in writing by all Parties to 23 this action or as authorized by further order of the Court. 24 4. “Defendants” shall mean COLIN MASON, STEVEN FORSYTH, KENNETH 25 SHELTON, and REID HARRIS. 26 5. “Plaintiff” shall mean SHEENA SHAW. 27 6. “Parties” shall mean Plaintiff and Defendants, identified above. 28 B. TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 The following terms apply to documents designated as “Confidential” by the Plaintiff or 2 Defendants and produced subject to the following Protective Order: 3 1. The Confidential Documents shall be used solely in connection with the civil case 4 Shaw v. Mason et al., E.D. Cal. Case No. 2:16-cv-00729-TLN-CKD and in the preparation and 5 trial of the case. The Parties do not waive any objections to the admissibility of the documents or 6 portions thereof in future proceedings in this case, including trial. 7 2. The “Designating Party” will designate the Confidential Documents as 8 confidential by affixing a mark labelling them “Confidential.” 9 3. The Confidential Documents may only be disclosed to the following persons: 10 (a) Counsel for Plaintiff, including partners and associate attorneys in their 11 offices, as counsel for Plaintiff in this case; 12 (b) Counsel for Defendants, including partners and associate attorneys in their 13 offices, as counsel for Defendants in this case; 14 (c) Paralegal, clerical, and secretarial personnel regularly employed by counsel 15 referred to in subparts (a) and (b), including stenographic deposition reporters or 16 videographers retained in connection with this action; 17 (d) Court personnel, including stenographic reporters or videographers 18 engaged in proceedings as are necessarily incidental to the preparation for the trial in the 19 civil action; 20 (e) Any expert, consultant, or investigator retained in connection with this 21 action, however, such persons must be advised of and abide by this protective order; 22 (f) The finder of fact at the time of trial, subject to the court’s rulings on in 23 limine motions and objections of counsel; 24 (g) Witnesses during their depositions in this action. If confidential documents 25 are used in the deposition, the documents must be identified as “Confidential” and the 26 portion of the deposition in which the documents are described should also be considered 27 confidential; and 28 (h) The parties to this action and any representatives acting on their behalf for 1 this action. 2 4. Before any Confidential Documents may be disclosed to persons described in 3 Subsections paragraph 3 above, each person to whom such Confidential Documents are disclosed, 4 except for Court officials and employees, shall be provided with a copy of this Protective Order 5 and shall sign a written certification in the form of the undertaking attached hereto and 6 incorporated herein. 7 5. No notes, lists, memoranda, index, electronic images, databases or compilation 8 prepared based wholly or in part upon examination of Confidential Documents shall be 9 disseminated to anyone not authorized to have access to Confidential Documents. 10 6. If the Confidential Documents are filed with any motion or other pleading, a party 11 may seek permission from the Court to file the Confidential Documents under seal according to 12 Local Rule 141. If permission is granted, the Confidential Documents will be filed and served in 13 accordance with Local Rule 141. 14 7. The designation of the Confidential Documents as “Confidential” and the 15 subsequent production thereof is without prejudice to the right of any party to oppose the 16 admissibility of the Confidential Documents or information contained therein. 17 8. Any party or non-party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time. 18 A party or non-party does not waive its right to challenge a confidentiality designation by electing 19 not to mount a challenge promptly after the original designation is disclosed. The Challenging 20 Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process by providing written notice of each designation 21 it is challenging and describing the basis for each challenge. The parties shall attempt to resolve 22 each challenge in good faith and must begin the process by conferring directly (in voice-to-voice 23 dialogue – other forms of communication are not sufficient) within seven (7) days of the date of 24 receiving notice of the challenge. In conferring, the Challenging Party must explain the basis for 25 its belief that the confidentiality designation was not proper and must give the Designating Party 26 an opportunity to review the designated material, to reconsider the circumstances, and, if no 27 change in designation is offered, to explain the basis for the chosen designation. A Challenging 28 Party may proceed to the next stage of the challenge process only if it has engaged in this meet 1 and confer process first or establishes that the Designating Party is unwilling to participate in the 2 meet and confer process in a timely manner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaw v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Shaw v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept. (Shaw v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)