Shaw v. Greater Houston Transportation Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Shaw v. Greater Houston Transportation Co.

764 S.W.2d 390, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 113, 1989 WL 4763

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 26, 1989

DocketNo. 01-88-00784-CV

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 764 S.W.2d 390 (Shaw v. Greater Houston Transportation Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaw v. Greater Houston Transportation Co., 764 S.W.2d 390, 1989 Tex. App. LEXIS 113, 1989 WL 4763 (Tex. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Coy C. Shaw and Richard Allen Hall, ask this court to reduce the appeal bond set by the trial court. They claim that the bond of $9,600.00 is excessive. We agree and reduce the amount to $1000.00.

Appellants filed a cash deposit in lieu of bond for $9,600.00 in compliance with the trial court’s order. The usual bond required to perfect an appeal is $1000.00, unless the court fixes a different amount. Tex.R.App.P. 46(a). Upon the motion of any party, this Court may increase or decrease the amount of the bond required. Tex.R.App.P. 49(b).

In response to the motion, appellees assert the bond posted is not excessive due to the length of the trial (seven days), and thus, the length of the record. This is not an adequate basis to support a bond of $9,600.00.

Accordingly, appellants’ motion to reduce the cost bond is granted. The bond in this cause is reduced to $1,000.00.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI