Shaver v. City of Peachtree City

582 S.E.2d 246, 261 Ga. App. 296, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1653, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 616
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Shaver v. City of Peachtree City. Read the opinion of the Court — 253 Ga. App. 212
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided May 16, 2003·No. A01A2500·Published

Opinion

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

In Shaver v. City of Peachtree City,1 we reversed the municipal court’s judgment, concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction as the result of an invalid charging instrument. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, in City of Peachtree City v. Shaver,2 reversed this Court’s judgment. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. Therefore, the judgment of the municipal court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shaver v. City of Peachtree City, 582 S.E.2d 246, 261 Ga. App. 296, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1653, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

582 S.E.2d 246 (Shaver v. City of Peachtree City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaver v. City of Peachtree City
558 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
City of Peachtree City v. Shaver
578 S.E.2d 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)