Shaver v. City of Peachtree City

582 S.E.2d 246, 261 Ga. App. 296, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1653, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 616
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 16, 2003
DocketA01A2500
StatusPublished

This text of 582 S.E.2d 246 (Shaver v. City of Peachtree City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shaver v. City of Peachtree City, 582 S.E.2d 246, 261 Ga. App. 296, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1653, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 616 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Ruffin, Presiding Judge.

In Shaver v. City of Peachtree City,1 we reversed the municipal court’s judgment, concluding that the court lacked jurisdiction as the result of an invalid charging instrument. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and, in City of Peachtree City v. Shaver,2 reversed this Court’s judgment. Accordingly, our judgment in this case is vacated, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court. Therefore, the judgment of the municipal court is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Johnson, P. J., and Ellington, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shaver v. City of Peachtree City
558 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2001)
City of Peachtree City v. Shaver
578 S.E.2d 409 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
582 S.E.2d 246, 261 Ga. App. 296, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1653, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaver-v-city-of-peachtree-city-gactapp-2003.