Sharum v. Lasley

1923 OK 323, 215 P. 757, 90 Okla. 34, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1098
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided May 29, 1923·No. 11205·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tbis cause was tried before a special judge, who upon overruling the motion for a new trial granted additional time in which to prepare and serve a ease-made. The case-made was not served in the time allowed, but before the expiration thereof, by order of the special judge, made after the expiration of the time that he was assigned to hold court in that district and after he had ceased to sit as a court therein, an additional extension was granted, and thereafter other orders were entered by him granting additional extensions.

It is settled that a special judge has no power, after he ceases to sit as a court, to extend the lime for making and serving a case-made, and where he attempts to do .so, his act is a nullity; therefore, the motion to dismiss must be sustained. McGuire v. McGuire, 78 Okla. 164, 189 Pac. 193; First State Bank v. School District, 63 Okla. 233, 164 Pac. 102; Bradley v. Farmers State Bank, 45 Okla. 763, 147 Pac. 302.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharum v. Lasley, 1923 OK 323, 215 P. 757, 90 Okla. 34, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1098 (Okla. 1923).

1923 OK 323 (Sharum v. Lasley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGuire v. McGuire
1920 OK 148 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)
First State Bank of Mountain Park v. School Dist. No. 65
1917 OK 169 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Bradley v. Farmers' State Bank
1915 OK 117 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)