McGuire v. McGuire

1920 OK 148, 189 P. 193, 78 Okla. 164, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 340
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided March 30, 1920·No. 11224·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OWEN, C. J.

It appears on motion to dismiss that at the time of overruling the motion for new trial an order was entered by the special judge, before whom the case was tried, extending the time in which to prepare and serve case-made, and thereafter orders were entered by the special judge granting additional extensions.

It has been repeatedly held that a special judge, after he has ceased to sit in the trial of the case, has no power to extend the time for making and serving a case-made. First State Bank v. School District, 63 Oklahoma, 164 Pac. 102; Osborne v. C., R. I. & P. R. Co., 45 Okla. 817, 147 Pac. 301; Bradley v. Farmers State Bank, 45 Okla. 763, 147 Pac. 302.

The appeal is dismissed.

KANE, RAINEY. PITCHFORD, JOHNSON, McNEILL, and BAILEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McGuire v. McGuire, 1920 OK 148, 189 P. 193, 78 Okla. 164, 1920 Okla. LEXIS 340 (Okla. 1920).

1920 OK 148 (McGuire v. McGuire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holiby v. Poteet
1930 OK 159 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1930)
McAleer v. Dawson
1925 OK 445 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Ragan v. Shannon
1924 OK 453 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Sharum v. Lasley
1923 OK 323 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Shawnee Nat. Bank v. Van Zant
1921 OK 355 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Bowles v. State
1921 OK CR 173 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1921)
Brown v. Parks
1921 OK 24 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Southwestern Electric Co. v. Nunn Electric Co.
1920 OK 359 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1920)