Sharp v. Miller

4 P. 1065, 66 Cal. 98, 2 Cal. Unrep. 400, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 697
California Supreme Court·Decided November 14, 1884·No. No. 7,612·Published·Cited by 16 cases

Opinion

The Court

-The order appealed from in this case is not appealable. The appellant contends that it is a special order made after final judgment. The judgment formerly rendered was reversed, and there was no judgment in the cause, when the order appealed from was made. The reversal of the judgment and order denying (lie motion for a new trial when the cause was here before (see 54 Cal. 829), placed the parties in the lower court in the same position as if the case had never been tried, with the exception that the opinion of this court must be followed so far as applicable in the new trial. (Stearns v. Aguirre, 7 Cal. 447.)

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharp v. Miller, 4 P. 1065, 66 Cal. 98, 2 Cal. Unrep. 400, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 697 (Cal. 1884).

4 P. 1065 (Sharp v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilton v. McNitt
200 Cal. App. 2d 879 (California Court of Appeal, 1962)
Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Golden State Co.
316 P.2d 966 (California Supreme Court, 1957)
City of San Diego v. Superior Court
224 P.2d 685 (California Supreme Court, 1950)
Schubert v. Bates
185 P.2d 793 (California Supreme Court, 1947)
Rinaldo v. Superior Court
59 P.2d 868 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Heinfelt v. Arth
41 P.2d 191 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Coon v. Jackson
1931 OK 435 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1931)
Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. Lake
257 P. 521 (California Supreme Court, 1927)
Markart v. Zeimer
239 P. 856 (California Court of Appeal, 1925)
In Re Kling
292 P. 453 (California Court of Appeal, 1920)
In Re Estate of Pusey
170 P. 846 (California Supreme Court, 1918)
People v. Hamilton
37 P. 627 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
Castagnino v. Balletta
21 P. 1097 (California Supreme Court, 1889)