Sharp v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sharp v. Hicks

26 S.E. 729, 102 Ga. 548, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 543

DecidedMarch 5, 1897

StatusPublished

This text of 26 S.E. 729 (Sharp v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharp v. Hicks, 26 S.E. 729, 102 Ga. 548, 1897 Ga. LEXIS 543 (Ga. 1897).

Pincite

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

The questions made by the bill of exceptions in this case having been fully examined and determined by this court upon the two writs of error therein which have heretofore been considered (see 89 Ga. 311, and 94 Ga. 624); and the trial judge, in rendering the judgment now complained of, having correctly based his opinion upon the ground that the-questions presented by the motion for new trial made in this case were-res adjudicata, he committed no error in overruling the same.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Levy and claim. Before Judge Candler. Newton superior court. March term, 1896.

George W Qleaton and Capers Dickson, for plaintiff. J. 8. Boynton, E. F. Edwards and J. I. Hall, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI