Sharp v. Hicks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Sharp v. Hicks

21 S.E. 208, 94 Ga. 624, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 221

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 16, 1894·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

This case was formerly before the Supreme Court. [626] 89 Ga. 311. It arose by the levy of an execution in. favor of Sharp against Turner on certain land to which a joint claim was interposed by Hicks and wife. She was Turner’s daughter. After the decision in 89 Ga., claimants were allowed to amend their claim affidavit by Hicks claiming an undivided half-interest in the .property, and his wife claiming (by separate affidavit) the other half-interest. The court ordered a trial of the claim of Hicks separately from that of his wife, on which trial the jury found the property not subject; and plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled.

G. W. Gleaton and Capers Dickson, for plaintiff. J. S. Boynton and E. E. Edwards, for claimant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case was formerly before the Supreme Court. [626] 89 Ga. 311. It arose by the levy of an execution in. favor of Sharp against Turner on certain land to which a joint claim was interposed by Hicks and wife. She was Turner’s daughter. After the decision in 89 Ga., claimants were allowed to amend their claim affidavit by Hicks claiming an undivided half-interest in the .property, and his wife claiming (by separate affidavit) the other half-interest. The court ordered a trial of the claim of Hicks separately from that of his wife, on which trial the jury found the property not subject; and plaintiff’s motion for a new trial was overruled.

G. W. Gleaton and Capers Dickson, for plaintiff. J. S. Boynton and E. E. Edwards, for claimant.

Sharp v. Hicks, 21 S.E. 208, 94 Ga. 624, 1894 Ga. LEXIS 221 (Ga. 1894).

Pincite

21 S.E. 208 (Sharp v. Hicks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related