Sharp v. Director of Revenue
365 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1034188, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 438
Opinion
ORDER
Andrew Sharp appeals from the trial court’s judgment upholding the administrative revocation of his driving privileges for refusing to submit to a chemical breath test. On appeal, Sharp claims that the Director of Revenue failed to prove that the arresting officer had reasonable grounds to believe that Sharp was driving while intoxicated. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sharp v. Director of Revenue, 365 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1034188, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 438 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).
365 S.W.3d 264 (Sharp v. Director of Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baldwin v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CO.
365 S.W.3d 264 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)