Baldwin v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CO.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baldwin v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CO.

365 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1034199, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 427

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2012

DocketWD 73715

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 365 S.W.3d 264 (Baldwin v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CO.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baldwin v. HARLEY DAVIDSON MOTOR CO., 365 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1034199, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Christopher Baldwin appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of his claims for Worker’s Compensation benefits from the Harley Davidson Motor Company and its insurer, American Casualty Company.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Mr. Christopher Baldwin appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Administrative Law Judge’s denial of his claims for Worker’s Compensation benefits from the Harley Davidson Motor Company and its insurer, American Casualty Company.

For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

365 S.W.3d 264, 2012 WL 1034199, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baldwin-v-harley-davidson-motor-co-moctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack