Sharma v. Ramlal

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sharma v. Ramlal

76 So. 3d 955, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17349, 2011 WL 5188986

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 2, 2011

DocketNo. 2D10-5211

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 76 So. 3d 955 (Sharma v. Ramlal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sharma v. Ramlal, 76 So. 3d 955, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17349, 2011 WL 5188986 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinions

KELLY, Judge.

Dave P. Sharma, individually, and as President and Director of Shri Saraswati Devi Mandir, Inc., appeals from the final summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellees, Narine Ramlal, Naraine An-nirude, Puchoon Surujal and Rajendra Singh. Because the appellees failed to carry their burden of showing that no genuine issues of material fact remain, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c); Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla.2000) (“Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 48 (Fla.1966) (“the burden to prove the nonexistence of genuine triable issues is on the moving party.”).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, J„ Concurs. LaROSE, J., Concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KELLY, Judge.

Dave P. Sharma, individually, and as President and Director of Shri Saraswati Devi Mandir, Inc., appeals from the final summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellees, Narine Ramlal, Naraine An-nirude, Puchoon Surujal and Rajendra Singh. Because the appellees failed to carry their burden of showing that no genuine issues of material fact remain, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c); Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla.2000) (“Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 48 (Fla.1966) (“the burden to prove the nonexistence of genuine triable issues is on the moving party.”).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, J„ Concurs. LaROSE, J., Concurs with opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 So. 3d 955, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17349, 2011 WL 5188986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharma-v-ramlal-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack