Sharma v. Ramlal

76 So. 3d 955, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17349, 2011 WL 5188986
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 2011·No. No. 2D10-5211·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

KELLY, Judge.

Dave P. Sharma, individually, and as President and Director of Shri Saraswati Devi Mandir, Inc., appeals from the final summary judgment rendered in favor of the appellees, Narine Ramlal, Naraine An-nirude, Puchoon Surujal and Rajendra Singh. Because the appellees failed to carry their burden of showing that no genuine issues of material fact remain, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.510(c); Volusia Cnty. v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So.2d 126, 130 (Fla.2000) (“Summary judgment is proper if there is no genuine issue of material fact and if the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.”); Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40, 48 (Fla.1966) (“the burden to prove the nonexistence of genuine triable issues is on the moving party.”).

Reversed and remanded.

KHOUZAM, J„ Concurs. LaROSE, J., Concurs with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sharma v. Ramlal, 76 So. 3d 955, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 17349, 2011 WL 5188986 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

76 So. 3d 955 (Sharma v. Ramlal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Iezzi Family Limited Partnership v. Edgewater Beach Owners Association, etc.
254 So. 3d 584 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Collado v. Baroukh
226 So. 3d 924 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
ELENA COLLADO, ETC. v. BRIGITTE BAROUKH
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017