Sharer v. State
This text of 1928 OK CR 270 (Sharer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Nowata county on a charge of hav *421 ing the possession of a still, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $150 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.
No notice of appeal, as required by section 2809, Comp. Stat. 1921, was served. There appears in the record a written notice of appeal, stating that plaintiff in error serves notice in open court of his intention to appeal to the Criminal Court of Appeals and requests that the notice be entered on the trial docket of the court. A defendant desiring to appeal in a criminal case must serve a written notice upon the court clerk and upon the county attorney. Section 2809, Comp. Stat. 1921. Section 782, Comp. Stat. 1921 (chapter 219, Session Laws 1917), does not repeal section 2809, supra, as has been many times held by this court. The notice here was served on neither the county attorney nor court clerk. Where the notice is not served as required by law, this court does not acquire jurisdiction. Burgess v. State, 18 Okla. Cr. 574, 197 P. 173; Kittrell v. State, 19 Okla. Cr. 56, 197 P. 1072; Lucas v. State, 22 Okla. Cr. 301, 210 P. 1040; Merritt v. State, 35 Okla. Cr. 194, 249 P. 436; Lutke v. State, 37 Okla. Cr. 18, 255 P. 719.
The attempted appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1928 OK CR 270, 269 P. 511, 40 Okla. Crim. 420, 1928 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sharer-v-state-oklacrimapp-1928.