Myers v. State

1931 OK CR 186, 298 P. 304, 50 Okla. Crim. 391, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 174
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Myers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 40 Okla. Crim. 170
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided April 18, 1931·No. No. A-7833.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted of driving an automobile upon the public streets of the city of Woodward while under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to serve a term of one year in the penitentiary and to pay a fine of fl,500.

The appeal was filed in this court April 29, 1930. The state has filed its motion to dismiss the appeal, first, because no notice of appeal was served on the county attorney or court clerk as provided by law, and no summons in error served upon the Attorney General or waived by the Attorney General. An examination of the record shows that the contention of the Attorney General is correct. A defendant desiring to appeal in a criminal case must serve a written notice upon the court clerk and upon the county attorney. Where the notice is not served as required by law, this court does not acquire jurisdiction. Sharer v. State, 40 Okla. Cr. 420, 269 Pac. 511.

The motion of the Attorney General is sustained, and ' the attempted appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 1931 OK CR 186, 298 P. 304, 50 Okla. Crim. 391, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 174 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

1931 OK CR 186 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharer v. State
1928 OK CR 270 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1928)