Shapiro v. Shapiro

Supreme Court of Georgia

Shapiro v. Shapiro

383 S.E.2d 134, 259 Ga. 405

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 11, 1989

Docket46757

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 383 S.E.2d 134 (Shapiro v. Shapiro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shapiro v. Shapiro, 383 S.E.2d 134, 259 Ga. 405 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

Bell, Justice.

We granted an application to appeal in this case to determine whether periodic cohabitation is a sufficient ground to terminate alimony under the live-in lover statute, OCGA § 19-6-19 (b). Because the record reveals no evidence that the appellee and her “live-in lover” dwelled together continuously, we conclude that the trial court [406]*406did not err in granting summary judgment to the appellee. Reiter v. Reiter, 258 Ga. 101 (365 SE2d 826) (1988); Daniels v. Daniels, 258 Ga. 791 (374 SE2d 735) (1989).

Decided September 11, 1989. Davis, Matthews & Quigley, Baxter L. Davis, Richard W. Schiffman, Jr., for appellant. C. Wilbur Warner, Jr., John C. Mayoue, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Weltner, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bell, Justice.

We granted an application to appeal in this case to determine whether periodic cohabitation is a sufficient ground to terminate alimony under the live-in lover statute, OCGA § 19-6-19 (b). Because the record reveals no evidence that the appellee and her “live-in lover” dwelled together continuously, we conclude that the trial court [406]*406did not err in granting summary judgment to the appellee. Reiter v. Reiter, 258 Ga. 101 (365 SE2d 826) (1988); Daniels v. Daniels, 258 Ga. 791 (374 SE2d 735) (1989).

Decided September 11, 1989. Davis, Matthews & Quigley, Baxter L. Davis, Richard W. Schiffman, Jr., for appellant. C. Wilbur Warner, Jr., John C. Mayoue, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Weltner, J., disqualified.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 S.E.2d 134, 259 Ga. 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-shapiro-ga-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack