Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Shapiro v. George F. Driscoll Co.

Shapiro v. George F. Driscoll Co.

266 A.D. 260, 42 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3534
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 4, 1943
StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D. 260 (Shapiro v. George F. Driscoll Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shapiro v. George F. Driscoll Co., 266 A.D. 260, 42 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3534 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1943).

Opinions

Per Curiam.-

The terms and specifications of the contract were so clear as to make it impossible as matter of law to claim that they contained an ambiguity which would justify submitting that question to a jury. Since there was no ambiguity in the contract, the conversations between the subcontractor and the architects raise no issue which should have been further litigated.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. State of New York
181 N.E. 357 (New York Court of Appeals, 1932)
Hedeman v. Fairbanks, Morse & Co.
36 N.E.2d 129 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)
Borough Construction Co. v. City of New York
93 N.E. 480 (New York Court of Appeals, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D. 260, 42 N.Y.S.2d 94, 1943 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shapiro-v-george-f-driscoll-co-nyappdiv-1943.