Home/New York Court of Appeals/Shannon v. Introne

Shannon v. Introne

423 N.E.2d 818, 53 N.Y.2d 929, 441 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2488
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 14, 1981·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs. The Legislature clearly and unambiguously limited the application of section 41.34 of the Mental Hygiene Law to community residential facilities for “four to fourteen mentally disabled persons.” Inasmuch as the facility proposed in this case will contain only three persons, it does not fall within the scope of section 41.34. We have examined petitioners’ other contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shannon v. Introne, 423 N.E.2d 818, 53 N.Y.2d 929, 441 N.Y.S.2d 60, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2488 (N.Y. 1981).

423 N.E.2d 818 (Shannon v. Introne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Board of Managers v. Rios
166 Misc. 2d 381 (New York Supreme Court, 1995)
Frontier Insurance v. State
146 Misc. 2d 237 (New York State Court of Claims, 1989)
Board of Education of Sewanhaka Central High School District v. Surles
145 Misc. 2d 149 (New York Supreme Court, 1989)
Gordon v. Burstein
116 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Galligan v. City of Schenectady
116 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Spitz v. Abrams
105 A.D.2d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Spitz v. Abrams
123 Misc. 2d 446 (New York Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Allison
117 Misc. 2d 463 (New York Supreme Court, 1983)