Shamie v. Grossman
This text of 34 Mich. App. 97 (Shamie v. Grossman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff filed an action on the promissory note of defendants. They moved for accelerated judgment on the basis of payment, GCR 1963, 116.1(5), and supported the motion with an [98]*98appropriate affidavit. Although afforded ample opportunity by way of amendment and discovery, plaintiff did not rebut the allegations of payment contained in defendants’ affidavit, and accelerated judgment in their favor entered.
The trial judge was justified in accepting the facts stated in defendants’ affidavit as true, People, ex rel. Thornton Construction Company, Inc., v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company (1967), 8 Mich App 540. Those facts support a finding of payment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Mich. App. 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamie-v-grossman-michctapp-1971.