Shamash v. David Bocchi Inc.

2023 NY Slip Op 03213
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 13, 2023
DocketIndex No. 157028/21 Appeal No. 451 Case No. 2022-05612
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 03213 (Shamash v. David Bocchi Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Shamash v. David Bocchi Inc., 2023 NY Slip Op 03213 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

Shamash v David Bocchi Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 03213)
Shamash v David Bocchi Inc.
2023 NY Slip Op 03213
Decided on June 13, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: June 13, 2023
Before: Oing, J.P., Singh, Moulton, Scarpulla, Shulman, JJ.

Index No. 157028/21 Appeal No. 451 Case No. 2022-05612

[*1]Sonia Shamash, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

David Bocchi Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.


Stagg Wabnik Law Group LLP, Garden City (Debra L. Wabnik of counsel), for appellant.

Sullivan & Worcester, LLP, New York (Gerry Silver of counsel), for respondents.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lynn R. Kotler, J.), entered on or about August 18, 2022, which granted defendants David Bocchi Inc., David Bocchi, Cheyenne McMillion, and Matthew Kern's motion for spoliation sanctions to the extent of entitling defendants to an adverse inference instruction at the time of trial and denied plaintiff's cross-motion for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting an adverse inference instruction for plaintiff's failure to preserve text messages between her and a former coworker. Plaintiff acted negligently in failing to preserve those messages when she purportedly broke her phone and the lost messages were relevant to contested issues

in this action (VOOM HD Holdings LLC v EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., 93 AD3d 33, 41-43 [1st Dept 2012]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 13, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shamash v. David Bocchi Inc.
2023 NY Slip Op 03213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 03213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shamash-v-david-bocchi-inc-nyappdiv-2023.