Shale v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Shale v. United States

409 F.2d 412

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 7, 1969·No. Misc. No. 1296·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court has failed to make findings of facts and conclusions of law following an evidentiary hearing, as is required by Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.; Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore, the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion for bail pending appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court has failed to make findings of facts and conclusions of law following an evidentiary hearing, as is required by Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.; Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore, the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion for bail pending appeal is denied.

Shale v. United States, 409 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

409 F.2d 412 (Shale v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related