Shale v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Shale v. United States

409 F.2d 412

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 7, 1969

DocketMisc. No. 1296

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 409 F.2d 412 (Shale v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shale v. United States, 409 F.2d 412 (5th Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court has failed to make findings of facts and conclusions of law following an evidentiary hearing, as is required by Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.; Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore, the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion for bail pending appeal is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The district court has failed to make findings of facts and conclusions of law following an evidentiary hearing, as is required by Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.; Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore, the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion for bail pending appeal is denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 F.2d 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shale-v-united-states-ca5-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack