John P. Shale v. United States
This text of 409 F.2d 412 (John P. Shale v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
John P. SHALE, Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.
Misc. No. 1296.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
April 7, 1969.
John Paul Howard, Jacksonville, Fla., for petitioner.
Gary B. Tullis, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., for respondent.
Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The district court has failed to make findings of facts and conclusions of law following an evidentiary hearing, as is required by Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.; Welch v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 400 F.2d 582; Waters v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1968, 392 F.2d 74. Therefore, the case is remanded to enable the district court to state its findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion for bail pending appeal is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
409 F.2d 412, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/john-p-shale-v-united-states-ca5-1969.