Shaikh v. Nissan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Shaikh v. Nissan

207 A.D.2d 480, 616 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8429

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 207 A.D.2d 480 (Shaikh v. Nissan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaikh v. Nissan, 207 A.D.2d 480, 616 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8429 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated November 9, 1992, which denied their motion for summary judgment, and granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, they have failed to raise any triable issue of fact which would preclude summary judgment in favor of the defendant (see, Rotuba Extruders v Ceppos, 46 NY2d 223, 231; Presta v Houssian, 186 AD2d 729). Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint was properly granted. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.), dated November 9, 1992, which denied their motion for summary judgment, and granted the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contentions, they have failed to raise any triable issue of fact which would preclude summary judgment in favor of the defendant (see, Rotuba Extruders v Ceppos, 46 NY2d 223, 231; Presta v Houssian, 186 AD2d 729). Accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint was properly granted. Bracken, J. P., Sullivan, Miller and Hart, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 A.D.2d 480, 616 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaikh-v-nissan-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack