Shaffer v. Shaffer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Shaffer v. Shaffer

84 So. 3d 1075, 2012 WL 676320, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 2, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-2576

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 So. 3d 1075 (Shaffer v. Shaffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Shaffer v. Shaffer, 84 So. 3d 1075, 2012 WL 676320, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Order Denying Former Wife’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is AFFIRMED. The cross-appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Mendoza v. Mendoza, 842 So.2d 1020, 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (noting that a. trial court’s reservation of jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees and costs at a later time does not affect the finality of the judgment itself for purposes of appeal and dismissing the former husband’s appeal because while his notice of appeal was timely as to the attorney’s fee order, it was untimely as to the underlying order, which is what he challenged).

DAVIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Order Denying Former Wife’s Request for Attorney’s Fees is AFFIRMED. The cross-appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See Mendoza v. Mendoza, 842 So.2d 1020, 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003) (noting that a. trial court’s reservation of jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees and costs at a later time does not affect the finality of the judgment itself for purposes of appeal and dismissing the former husband’s appeal because while his notice of appeal was timely as to the attorney’s fee order, it was untimely as to the underlying order, which is what he challenged).

DAVIS, CLARK, and ROWE, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 3d 1075, 2012 WL 676320, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/shaffer-v-shaffer-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack