Katherine Hiett Viker v. Arthur Collin Cherry

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0866

_____________________________

KATHERINE HIETT VIKER,

Appellant,

v.

ARTHUR COLLIN CHERRY,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Stewart E. Parsons, Senior Judge.

July 15, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s orders pertaining to a modification of the parties’ parenting plan, modification of the parties’ child support arrangement, and appellant’s motion for attorney’s fees.

We dismiss as to the issues pertaining to the parenting plan and the child support arrangement for lack of jurisdiction because appellant failed to timely appeal those orders. Shaffer v. Shaffer, 84 So. 3d 1075 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012); Mendoza v. Mendoza, 842 So. 2d 1020 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

The sole remaining issue appellant raises is the trial court’s denial of her motion for attorney’s fees. We find no error with the trial court’s order denying her motion and affirm accordingly.

AFFIRMED in part and DISMISSED in part.

WOLF, ROWE, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

_____________________________

Emilian "Ian" Bucataru, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

A. Collin Cherry of Law Office of Collin Cherry, P.L., Tallahassee, for Appellee.