Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia

78 A.3d 1043, 621 Pa. 400, 2013 WL 5806466, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2493
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 29, 2013·No. No. 276 WAL 2013·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2013, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues are:

(1) Whether the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 517.1-517.18, bars a contractor from recovery under a theory of quantum meruit in the absence of a valid and enforceable home improvement contract under the Act[J

(2) Whether the decisions of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania in Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia, [67 A.3d 8] (Pa.Super.Ct.2013), and Durst v. Milroy, 52 A.3d 357, 2012 PA Super 179 (Pa.Super.Ct.2012), conflict with the Home Improvement Consumer Protection Act, 73 Pa. Stat. §§ 517.7(a) and (g), and should be overturned by this Court[.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia, 78 A.3d 1043, 621 Pa. 400, 2013 WL 5806466, 2013 Pa. LEXIS 2493 (Pa. 2013).

78 A.3d 1043 (Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shafer Electric & Construction v. Mantia
96 A.3d 989 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2014)