Shackelford v. City of Wilmington
505 S.E.2d 80, 349 N.C. 222, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 564
Opinion
Justice Webb took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See Nesbit v. Howard, 333 N.C. 782, 429 S.E.2d 730 (1993).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Shackelford v. City of Wilmington, 505 S.E.2d 80, 349 N.C. 222, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 564 (N.C. 1998).
505 S.E.2d 80 (Shackelford v. City of Wilmington) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Arquilla v. City of Salisbury
523 S.E.2d 155 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Hayes v. Town of Fairmont
511 S.E.2d 638 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)