Hayes v. Town of Fairmont
511 S.E.2d 638, 350 N.C. 81, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 42
Opinion
Justice Martin recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Shackelford v. City of Wilmington, 349 N.C. 222, 505 S.E.2d 80 (1998).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hayes v. Town of Fairmont, 511 S.E.2d 638, 350 N.C. 81, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 42 (N.C. 1999).
511 S.E.2d 638 (Hayes v. Town of Fairmont) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCrann v. VILLAGE OF PINEHURST
716 S.E.2d 667 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Couch v. Private Diagnostic Clinic
520 S.E.2d 785 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1999)