Hayes v. Town of Fairmont

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Hayes v. Town of Fairmont

511 S.E.2d 638, 350 N.C. 81, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 42

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedMarch 4, 1999

DocketNo. 338PA98

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 511 S.E.2d 638 (Hayes v. Town of Fairmont) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayes v. Town of Fairmont, 511 S.E.2d 638, 350 N.C. 81, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 42 (N.C. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Justice Martin recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Shackelford v. City of Wilmington, 349 N.C. 222, 505 S.E.2d 80 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Justice Martin recused and took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See, e.g., Shackelford v. City of Wilmington, 349 N.C. 222, 505 S.E.2d 80 (1998).

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 S.E.2d 638, 350 N.C. 81, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 42, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-town-of-fairmont-nc-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack