Seyfert v. State

275 A.D.2d 317, 712 N.Y.S.2d 408
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 7, 2000·No. Claim No. 92844·Published

Opinion

—In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimants appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Silverman, J.), dated August 11, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, and upon the granting of the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment in its favor as a matter of law, dismissed the claims.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Court of Claims properly determined that the claimants failed to meet their burden of establishing that the alleged defect had existed for such a length of time as to charge the defendant with constructive notice of its presence (see, Idel v Mitchell, 158 NY 134, 139; Buckley v Sun & Surf Beach Club, 268 AD2d 496; see also, Glenn v Oakdale Contr. Co., 257 NY 497, 499-500). Accordingly, the claims were properly dismissed (see, CPLR 4401). Santucci, J. P., S. Miller, Florio and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seyfert v. State, 275 A.D.2d 317, 712 N.Y.S.2d 408 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

275 A.D.2d 317 (Seyfert v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glenn v. Oakdale Contracting Co., Inc.
178 N.E. 770 (New York Court of Appeals, 1931)
Idel v. . Mitchell
52 N.E. 740 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)
Buckley v. Sun & Surf Beach Club, Inc.
268 A.D.2d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)