Buckley v. Sun & Surf Beach Club, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Buckley v. Sun & Surf Beach Club, Inc.

268 A.D.2d 496, 701 N.Y.S.2d 668, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 676

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated December 18, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs claim that the infant plaintiff was injured when she jumped from a lifeguard stand owned by the defendant, and part of her left ring finger was severed when it caught on a nail protruding from the stand.

There is no basis to disturb the award of summary judgment to the defendant on the ground that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the alleged defective condition, and that it did not create that condition (see, Bykofsky v Waldbaum’s Supermarkets, 210 AD2d 280).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated December 18, 1998, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiffs claim that the infant plaintiff was injured when she jumped from a lifeguard stand owned by the defendant, and part of her left ring finger was severed when it caught on a nail protruding from the stand.

There is no basis to disturb the award of summary judgment to the defendant on the ground that it did not have actual or constructive notice of the alleged defective condition, and that it did not create that condition (see, Bykofsky v Waldbaum’s Supermarkets, 210 AD2d 280).

The plaintiffs’ remaining contention is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Buckley v. Sun & Surf Beach Club, Inc., 268 A.D.2d 496, 701 N.Y.S.2d 668, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 676 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

268 A.D.2d 496 (Buckley v. Sun & Surf Beach Club, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related