Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Sexton v. State

Sexton v. State

196 Ga. 298
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 7, 1943
DocketNo. 14589
StatusPublished

This text of 196 Ga. 298 (Sexton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sexton v. State, 196 Ga. 298 (Ga. 1943).

Opinion

Jenkins, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the refusal to grant a new trial, the motion therefor being based on the general grounds only, there being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and the same having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment is affirmed. Goolsby v. State, 196 Ga. 188 (26 S. E. 2d, 181).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. W. L. Denton and G. B. McGarity, for plaintiff in error. T. Grady Head, attorney-general, Hal G. Hutchens, solicitor-general, W. A. Foster Jr., and L. G. Groves, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goolsby v. State
26 S.E.2d 181 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 Ga. 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-state-ga-1943.