Goolsby v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Goolsby v. State

196 Ga. 188

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 11, 1943

DocketNo. 14541

StatusPublished

This text of 196 Ga. 188 (Goolsby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Goolsby v. State, 196 Ga. 188 (Ga. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the refusal to grant a new trial, the motion therefor being based on the general grounds only, there being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and the same having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Sydney H. Baynes, for plaintiff in error. T. Grady Head, attorney-general, G. S. Baldwin, solicitor-general, and L. G. Groves, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grice, Justice.

The sole assignment of error relating to the refusal to grant a new trial, the motion therefor being based on the general grounds only, there being sufficient evidence to support the verdict, and the same having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment is

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur. Sydney H. Baynes, for plaintiff in error. T. Grady Head, attorney-general, G. S. Baldwin, solicitor-general, and L. G. Groves, assistant attorney-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

196 Ga. 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/goolsby-v-state-ga-1943.