Sexton v. Newark District Telegraph Co.
This text of 91 A. 1070 (Sexton v. Newark District Telegraph Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed. The opinion filed in that court, which deals -with some topics that are not stirred upon this appeal, deals also and in a manner entirely satisfactory to us with the point upon which this appeal is argued bjr- counsel, viz., the legal situation presented by the fact that the statute of May 3d, 1911, took effect upon the day on which the plaintiff’s intestate was killed.
For the reasons given upon this branch of the case by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court, the judgment of that court is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, Bogert, Yre-DENBURGH, WHITE, HEPPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, JJ. 13.
For reversal — Kone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A. 1070, 86 N.J.L. 701, 1914 N.J. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sexton-v-newark-district-telegraph-co-nj-1914.