Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided July 6, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-00375·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN SEXTON, Case No.: 23-cv-00375-W-BGS

12 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER 13 v. REGULATING DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL 14 MITRATECH, INC., PROCEEDINGS 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules, a Case Management Conference was 18 held on June 30, 2023. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties and 19 being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED: 21 1. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional 22 pleadings shall be filed by August 14, 2023. 23 2. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by October 30, 2023. 24 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 25 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period 26 of time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, 27 taking into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal 28 Rules of Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer 1 with regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The 2 Court expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court 3 intervention through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any 4 discovery issue, counsel shall follow the procedures outlined in the assigned magistrate 5 judge’s Chambers Rules to timely raise the dispute. A failure to comply in this regard 6 will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of the court, no 7 stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by the court. 8 Discovery limits in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Civil Local Rules, including 9 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33(a)(1), Civil Local Rules 33.1.a, and 36.1.a shall 10 apply. Absent prior leave of Court to exceed these limits, the Court will not consider any 11 discovery dispute arising from discovery requests in excess of these limits. 12 3. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by November 13 30, 2023. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A), the parties must identify any person 14 who may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the 15 Fed. R. Evid. This requirement is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange 16 of rebuttal experts shall be by December 14, 2023. The written designations shall 17 include the name, address and telephone number of the expert and a reasonable summary 18 of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list shall also include the normal 19 rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. 20 4. By January 16, 2024, each party shall comply with the disclosure 21 provisions in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This 22 disclosure requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide 23 expert testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the 24 giving of expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party 25 that fails to make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be 26 permitted to use evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of 27 trial. In addition, the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 28 37(c). 1 5. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 2 evidence under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D) and 26(e) by January 29, 3 2024. 4 6. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by February 29, 5 2024. The parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph 6 governing fact discovery. 7 7. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 8 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 9 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 10 8. All other pretrial motions must be filed by March 29, 2024. Counsel for the 11 moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will 12 hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the 13 hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. 14 Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being 15 heard. Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set 16 by the district judge. 17 9. A Mandatory Settlement Conference shall be conducted on June 21, 2024 at 18 2:00 P.M. in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal. Counsel or any 19 party representing himself or herself shall lodge confidential settlement briefs directly to 20 chambers by June 7, 2024. Counsel should include in their brief the names and titles of 21 all participants, including attorneys and client representatives, expected to participate in 22 the conference on behalf of their client(s). The briefs must address the legal and factual 23 issues in the case and should focus on issues most pertinent to settling the matter. Briefs 24 do not need to be filed or served on opposing counsel. The briefs must also include any 25 prior settlement offer or demand, as well as the offer or demand the party will make at the 26 MSC. The Court will keep this information confidential unless the party authorizes the 27 Court to share the information with opposing counsel. MSC briefs must be emailed to 28 efile_Skomal@casd.uscourts.gov. 1 10. All parties are ordered to read and to fully comply with the Chamber Rules 2 of the assigned magistrate judge. The MSC is scheduled to be conducted by video 3 conference pursuant to the instructions below. However, the parties may contact Judge 4 Skomal’s chambers to request the MSC be held in-person. All parties, adjusters for 5 insured defendants, and client representatives must be present and have full and complete 6 authority to enter into a binding settlement at the MSC.1 The purpose of this requirement 7 is to have representatives present who can settle the case during the course of the 8 conference without consulting a superior. Parties seeking permission to be excused from 9 attending the MSC in person must follow the procedures outlined in Judge Skomal’s 10 Chambers’ Rules. Failure of any of the above parties to appear at the MSC without the 11 Court’s permission will be grounds for sanctions. The principal attorneys responsible for 12 the litigation must also be present in person and prepared to discuss all of the legal and 13 factual issues in the case. 14 11. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c), if an opposing party fails to file 15 opposition papers in the time and manner required by Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), that 16 failure may constitute a consent to the granting of a motion or other request for ruling by 17 the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc., (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc. (Sexton v. Mitratech Holdings, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)