Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium

91 A.2d 162, 21 N.J. Super. 329, 1952 N.J. Super. LEXIS 800

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided September 10, 1952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Ewart in Sexton v. Bates, 17 N. J. Super. 246 (Law Div. 1951).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium, 91 A.2d 162, 21 N.J. Super. 329, 1952 N.J. Super. LEXIS 800 (N.J. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

91 A.2d 162 (Sexton v. Essex County Ritualarium) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.