Sewell v. State

440 S.W.2d 852, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 840
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 21, 1969·No. No. 42079·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for the subsequent offense of driving while intoxicated; the punishment, two years in the Texas Department of Corrections.

The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C. C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court “(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.

Nothing appears in the record which should be considered under the provisions of Article 40.09, Section 13, supra.

No question of indigency is raised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sewell v. State, 440 S.W.2d 852, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 840 (Tex. 1969).

440 S.W.2d 852 (Sewell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
478 S.W.2d 947 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Stoddard v. State
475 S.W.2d 744 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1972)
Reeves v. State
457 S.W.2d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1970)