Sewell v. State
This text of 440 S.W.2d 852 (Sewell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
The conviction is for the subsequent offense of driving while intoxicated; the punishment, two years in the Texas Department of Corrections.
The appellant did not comply with Section 9 of Article 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C. C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court “(w)ithin thirty days after approval of the record by the court” or during any additional period which the court authorized setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Yarbrough v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 408 S.W.2d 230; Melick v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 412; Dewitt v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 409 S.W.2d 852; Ochoa v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 424 S.W.2d 642.
Nothing appears in the record which should be considered under the provisions of Article 40.09, Section 13, supra.
No question of indigency is raised.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
440 S.W.2d 852, 1969 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sewell-v-state-texcrimapp-1969.