Ochoa v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Ochoa v. State

424 S.W.2d 642

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 21, 1968

Docket41096

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 424 S.W.2d 642 (Ochoa v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ochoa v. State, 424 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary; the punishment was assessed at two years.

The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 728.

The grounds attempted to be presented in appellant’s brief filed in this court do not raise any constitutional questions.

Nothing appears in the record which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

No question of indigency is raised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI