Ochoa v. State

424 S.W.2d 642
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 21, 1968·No. 41096·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION

BELCHER, Judge.

The conviction is for burglary; the punishment was assessed at two years.

The appellant did not comply with Sec. 9 of Art. 40.09, Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P., in that he did not file a brief in the trial court setting forth the grounds of error of which he desires to complain on appeal. Hill v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 403 S.W.2d 797; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 420 S.W.2d 728.

The grounds attempted to be presented in appellant’s brief filed in this court do not raise any constitutional questions.

Nothing appears in the record which we should consider as unassigned error under Section 13 of Article 40.09, supra.

No question of indigency is raised.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ochoa v. State, 424 S.W.2d 642 (Tex. 1968).

424 S.W.2d 642 (Ochoa v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sewell v. State
440 S.W.2d 852 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Brown v. State
439 S.W.2d 349 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Sanchez v. State
438 S.W.2d 915 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Schmeideberg v. State
438 S.W.2d 812 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)
Hollis v. State
436 S.W.2d 341 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1969)