Seven Valleys Bank v. Smith

61 N.W. 606, 43 Neb. 237, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 324
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 3, 1895·No. No. 4681·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Norval, C. J.

This was an action instituted before a justice of the peace by the plaintiff in error, where it obtained a judgment, and the defendant prosecuted an appeal. In the district court there was a verdict for the defendant. The record before us consists solely of the transcript of the justice docket, the pleadings in the district court, and the verdict of the jury. If a judgment has been entered on the verdict, the record before us fails to disclose it. There being no final judgment in the case, the proceeding in error must be dismissed. (Daniels v. Tibbets, 16 Neb., 666; Gartner v. State, 36 Neb., 280; Stone v. Neeley, 34 Neb., 81; Smith v. Johnson, 37 Neb., 675; Baker v. Kloster, 41 Neb., 890.) The petition in error is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seven Valleys Bank v. Smith, 61 N.W. 606, 43 Neb. 237, 1895 Neb. LEXIS 324 (Neb. 1895).

61 N.W. 606 (Seven Valleys Bank v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Farrington v. State
218 N.W. 590 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1928)
Lewis v. Barker
65 N.W. 778 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Einspahr v. Smith
64 N.W. 698 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)