Baker v. Kloster

60 N.W. 318, 41 Neb. 890, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 235
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided October 2, 1894·No. No. 5535·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Norval, C. J.

The petition in error must be dismissed, for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is not before us. The transcript filed in this court consists alone of the petition,. answer, instructions to the jury, and motion for a new trial. No journal entries are in the record, nor does [891]*891it appear that a verdict has ever been returned by the jury, or that the motion for a new trial has been passed upon, or that a final judgment has been entered in the case. It is only a judgment, or final order, rendered by the district court that can be reviewed by the supreme court, and unless the transcript brought to this court contains such judgment, or final order, the proceeding will be dismissed. The petition in error is

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baker v. Kloster, 60 N.W. 318, 41 Neb. 890, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 235 (Neb. 1894).

60 N.W. 318 (Baker v. Kloster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Modern Woodmen of America v. Plummer
105 N.W. 181 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1905)
Slobodisky v. Curtis
78 N.W. 522 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1899)
Einspahr v. Exchange National Bank
68 N.W. 933 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Jandt v. Deranlieu
61 N.W. 632 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Seven Valleys Bank v. Smith
61 N.W. 606 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1895)
Garneau v. Omaha Printing Co.
61 N.W. 100 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1894)