Baker v. Kloster
This text of 60 N.W. 318 (Baker v. Kloster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition in error must be dismissed, for the reason that the judgment sought to be reviewed is not before us. The transcript filed in this court consists alone of the petition,. answer, instructions to the jury, and motion for a new trial. No journal entries are in the record, nor does [891]*891it appear that a verdict has ever been returned by the jury, or that the motion for a new trial has been passed upon, or that a final judgment has been entered in the case. It is only a judgment, or final order, rendered by the district court that can be reviewed by the supreme court, and unless the transcript brought to this court contains such judgment, or final order, the proceeding will be dismissed. The petition in error is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 N.W. 318, 41 Neb. 890, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baker-v-kloster-neb-1894.