Sessler v. Sun Bank, N.A.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sessler v. Sun Bank, N.A.

616 So. 2d 176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4031, 1993 WL 95493

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 2, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1495

StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 176 (Sessler v. Sun Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sessler v. Sun Bank, N.A., 616 So. 2d 176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4031, 1993 WL 95493 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

COBB, Judge.

The appellant raised two issues on this appeal after remand¹ relating to the taxation of costs and the sufficiency of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees.

Initially, we note that both parties agree that the trial court erred in not assessing costs pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400, and thus, the amended final judgment is reversed as to costs.

As to appellant’s second point, a careful review of the record reveals that the trial court considered all necessary factors pursuant to Florida Patient’s Compensation [177]*177Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). As such, we affirm the award of attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J. and HARRIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

COBB, Judge.

The appellant raised two issues on this appeal after remand¹ relating to the taxation of costs and the sufficiency of the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees.

Initially, we note that both parties agree that the trial court erred in not assessing costs pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.400, and thus, the amended final judgment is reversed as to costs.

As to appellant’s second point, a careful review of the record reveals that the trial court considered all necessary factors pursuant to Florida Patient’s Compensation [177]*177Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985). As such, we affirm the award of attorney’s fees.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED.

GOSHORN, C.J. and HARRIS, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 So. 2d 176, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4031, 1993 WL 95493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sessler-v-sun-bank-na-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack