Sessler v. Sun Bank, N.A.
This text of 589 So. 2d 361 (Sessler v. Sun Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant seeks review of a summary final judgment which recognized Sessler’s claim of lien under section 713.58, Florida Statutes (1989), against a 1985 Subaru DL station wagon delivered by its owner to appellant for repairs, but which restricted appellant to recovery of fourteen days’ storage charges based on the fourteen-day notice provision in section 713.78, Florida [362]*362Statutes. Contrary to the trial judge, we conclude that section 713.78 has no application to this transaction. Appellant is entitled to an adjudication of reasonable storage charges pursuant to section 713.58 without regard to the requirements of section 713.78. This judgment is reversed and remanded for a determination of factual issues presently disputed on the record as to the reasonable number of days and the reasonable daily charge for storage pursuant to section 713.585(5)(e).1
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
589 So. 2d 361, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 11121, 1991 WL 227669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sessler-v-sun-bank-na-fladistctapp-1991.